Josh Boyer wrote:
The addition of a new piece of functionality does not immediately
taint or modify the core of what Fedora is. Maybe instead of just
steadfastly asserting there should be no Change, you could work _with_
people as they try to include Change to address specific needs that
aren't being met.
So now after the "good balance", you bring up the "Change" with a
capital
'C' (plagiarized from Barack Obama). Can you please cut down on the
buzzword-loaden rhetoric bullshit?
No, sorry, change is not always for the good. Statistically, a random change
has 50% probability of not being an improvement. So somebody opposing one
particular change is not necessarily a change-phobic luddite. You need to
convince us that the proposal you defend actually makes things better, not
just different, and I'm not convinced at all (in fact I'm actually convinced
that it makes things worse), sorry.
Kevin Kofler