On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 15:01:24 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851783
The main argument is that for typical and varied workloads in Fedora,
mostly on consumer hardware, we should use mq-deadline scheduler
rather than either none or bfq.
It may be true most folks with NVMe won't see anything bad with none,
but those who have heavier IO workloads are likely to be better off
with mq-deadline.
Further details are in the bug, but let's discuss it on list. Thanks!
There was this thread about our systems hanging, and the workaround was
to revert to mq-deadline from bfq:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
There are a few threads on AskFedora about systems hanging. They're not
the easiest to debug but we did suggest people try switching to
mq-deadline to see if it helps:
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/whole-os-freezes-watching-a-video-with-mp...
I don't know enough about this to say if it's a bug and if it has been
fixed.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London