On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 06:16:47PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
That would break scripts etc that assume the cyphesis-selinux package is still
available (either as a real package, or a Provides somewhere else). Why
would it be a good thing to intentionally cause this breakage?
It seems to me that in some case (and here it could be such a case) it
is acceptable not to be backward compatible, here in order to have the
stand-alone cyphesis-selinux package completly disappear, and avoid
inflating the number of provides.
--
Pat