Rex Dieter schrieb:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 04.01.2007 22:22, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> It would be consistent to have something like
>> Fedora Desktop (GNOME edition) and
>> Fedora Desktop (KDE edition)
>> It's confusing and discriminatory to call one of the spins as the
>> desktop when you have more (which is likely to increase) than one
>> desktop oriented spins.
> +1 from me to this as a long term Gnome user that's not much interested
> in KDE; but I know others are.
>
> This issue brings up a interesting question: Which board has the power
> to influence and adjust this particular naming scheme in our new
> "merged" world? FESCo or the Fedora Board?
Sounds like the consensus (so far) is the Board.
BTW, in case it wasn't clear from my other mails: I actually agree that
the Boards is the best place for this sort of decision, as it's more a
political "big picture" thing. Nevertheless I think it's FESCo (or
better: it not yet defined successor) job to work out the details (maybe
in a FESCo-distribution-sub-committee) and present it to the Boards to
get an ACK from it.
You can now count 2 Board
members (Rahul and me) for being in favor of this. (:
thx.
Cu
thl