Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> writes:
Remi Collet wrote:
> For me, the %changelog "must" stay branch specific.
> p.e, I don't want the f16 branch polluted by "mass rebuild" entry from
> rawhide.
You're just too pedantic about that. I stopped caring about this
issue eons
ago, even in CVS days, where I'd just "sync from devel", i.e. overwrite the
branch specfile with the one from devel. And I wasn't the only one doing
that. Everything else is just unmaintainable.
Just keep the branches in sync. If the changelog would the only
difference
otherwise, nobody will care. (And if not, try %if 0%{?fedora} > n
conditionals.)
[ shrug... ] The fact that *you* don't care is not evidence that nobody
else cares, and it is certainly not evidence that nobody else should care.
regards, tom lane