Re: About the Future of Communishift
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 07:16:02AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:10 AM clime <clime(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 12:59, clime <clime(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 12:48, Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > However, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [3] and the
California
> > > Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) [4] basically makes the Fedora Infrastructure
team
> > > (and thus Red Hat) responsible for the content hosted by any services
running in
> > > our infrastructure. In other words, the Fedora Infrastructure team would
be
> > > responsible to answer all GDPR/CCPA related requests and requirements for
any
> > > and all services running in communishift (services that the team has 0
knowledge
> > > about, that's the whole goal of communishift).
>
My read of this is that right now, there will be no way for the
community to run applications in Fedora Infrastructure in a way that
CPE can be divorced from it completely. That is because their goal of
running only OpenShift and then not caring about what's inside is
legally not possible.
Hmm. But how, for example, cloud providers are able to provide
infrastructure without taking responsibility for what's hosted?
I don't think GCP is handling any GPDR/CCPA requests for clients' stuff…
I don't really expect an answer. From my experience, it's impossible
to get straight, yes/no, binary answer from lawyers.
--
Tomasz Torcz Only gods can safely risk perfection,
tomek(a)pipebreaker.pl it's a dangerous thing for a man. — Alia