On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:14:20 -0800
Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 09:55 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:43:02 +0100, FD (Francesco) wrote:
> >
> >> fawkes-plugin-player.x86_64 require libgeos-3.3.0.so (64bit) but
> >> geos.x86_64 package provides libgeos-3.3.1.so
> >
> > It has been reported before and in the right place:
> >
> >
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/fawkes
> >
> > An update of "geos" is incompatible and should not have been
> > published:
> >
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14436/geos-3.3.1-1.fc16
>
> And an arguable abuse of the process, a submitter setting karma: 1
> and then giving their own update the requisite karma++ to get it
> pushed to stable almost immediately. :(
My recollection is that FESCo has specifically decided that
maintainers must not +1 their own updates, but this does not appear
to be stated anywhere in the updates policy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
Perhaps it should be updated.
Yeah, we should update that.
See also: