Re: Mass rebuilds update
A few I've just tried to build chosen pretty much at random from the
above list:
boinc-client
builds fine - there was a FTBFS months ago
(#1251482) referring to
openssl but it's fine now
activemq-cpp
Already tracked by #1423204 - upstream have,
slightly strangely,
included the fix in a comment but not their source repo
I've attached a working patch to the ticket. (I forked in Pagure but it
seems it won't let me push right now - I guess it needs longer to sync
than I expected or can be bothered to wait!)
dvb-apps
Was about to say this was fine until I built for
rawhide and saw the
problem.
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/43705/ removed the IOCTL it uses
with the comment that nothing uses it! not sure quite what to say about
this one. It's old and seems to have a few bugs reported against it -
https://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git contains replacements for some of
them, using the dvbv5 API rather than the dvbv3 API these apps use.
Easiest thing might be to remove the function the IOCTL is for from
dst-utils.
In future we should probably consider encouraging users to move to newer
utils though.
Michael
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, at 10:24 AM, Michael Cullen wrote:
> A few I've just tried to build chosen pretty much at random from the
> above list:
>
> boinc-client
> builds fine - there was a FTBFS months ago
(#1251482) referring to
> openssl but it's fine now
>
> activemq-cpp
> Already tracked by #1423204 - upstream have,
slightly strangely,
> included the fix in a comment but not their source repo
> I've attached a working patch to the ticket. (I forked in Pagure but it
> seems it won't let me push right now - I guess it needs longer to sync
> than I expected or can be bothered to wait!)
>
> dvb-apps
> Was about to say this was fine until I built for
rawhide and saw the
> problem.
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/43705/ removed the IOCTL it uses
> with the comment that nothing uses it! not sure quite what to say about
> this one. It's old and seems to have a few bugs reported against it -
> https://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git contains replacements for some of
> them, using the dvbv5 API rather than the dvbv3 API these apps use.
> Easiest thing might be to remove the function the IOCTL is for from
> dst-utils.
> In future we should probably consider encouraging users to move to newer
> utils though.
>
> Michael
>
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, at 12:53 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez
> > <xose.vazquez(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 10/22/2017 04:08 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > >> Mat Booth wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore <dennis(a)ausil.us>
wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> [3]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe
that there
> > >>> were "0 failed builds" :-)
> > >> Current status?
> > >
> > > Digging a bit deeper, there are ~880 packages with building problems.
> > > Some of them since fedora 20/21:
> > >
> >
> > > quasselc-0-3.20170111gita0a1e6b | fc26
> > > quassel-irssi-0-4.20170119git7b034e3 | fc26
> >
> > Where is this list sourced from? I maintain both of these packages,
> > and to my knowledge, they're building fine. (And no FTBFS bugs have
> > been filed against them).
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23320
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23342
> >
> > This makes me slightly dubious about the rest of the list.
> >
> > Ben Rosser
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org