On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 19:52 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 10:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> The problem is that it seems Bastien didn't think too hard about what
> use cases the design would need to cover, in terms of actual uses of
> actual hardware. Note that this is not the same as attacking the
> interface design per se. The design is fine for the use cases it
> covers.
> The problem is it doesn't cover all of the use cases it needs to.
The use cases were there for people to read for *1 frickin' year*. It
went through Fesco's approval. You would have thought *someone* *anyone*
would have seen that use cases were missing.
You keep falling back on the feature page.
Sorry, it's kind of hard to test something that doesn't exist. I don't
understand why you seem to be having so much trouble understanding that.
You didn't, I didn't, people tried to close the door after
the horse had
bolted.
Wide testing isn't going to happen until at least the release of Beta.
That's why it's called Beta.
This "Oh, you didn't complain a year ago you're too late" thing is a
cop-out.