Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> writes:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 18:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> [ consults CVS... ] So XZ support in F-11's rpm is less than a week
> old, there is *no* support in F-10, and we're already requiring
> the capability in order to do useful development work?
> All I can say is WTF.
An rpm with Xz support is in F11 updates-testing. I'm pretty sure
it's
also in updates-testing for F10.
It is not in F-10's package CVS, let alone in updates-testing. Yes,
I looked before complaining. This was not well-managed.
regards, tom lane