On 4/6/20 11:17 AM, Leigh Griffin wrote:
It's a form of engagement among others that we are partaking in
day in
day out, week in week out.
Ironically, you have illustrated my point here with your response, which
isn't engagement.
I have answered every question directly, if I missed one in the
multiple
threads and someone wants it answered, feel free to forward it onto me
directly and I can answer it.
Much of what people are writing aren't questions, they are arguments.
You have not been answering those, but have instead been replying with
non-sequiters, like the above "It's a form of engagement among others…"
Everything is untrue when paraphrased to suit a narrative.
You said "The CPE relationship with stakeholders is unique, it's clear
the visions are not aligned across all bodies (and we do not expect it
to be) and we don't have a product." I've demonstrated that this is not
true.
For sure
stakeholder misalignment is part and parcel of Engineering life, CPEs
stakeholder needs, our particular remit and how all of these things
interact are industry unique in my experience and the kind of alignment
needed might never be there that One would expect and hope for in a more
traditional Engineering setting. I'm happy to debate that in a
separate thread but I feel going into how the team is structured and how
that relationship works is a distraction that this thread does not need.
You introduced this distraction, I simply demonstrated that it was not true.