Am 02.11.2015 um 00:36 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
> *who* if not the package maintainer which hopefully uses his own
> packages should have the final say? some group of people not
> understanding the issues really?
The counterargument is that we keep seeing major version updates that
violate our existing updates policy. Who if not a neutral party charged
with upholding that policy should have the final say? Some maintainers
who clearly haven't read it?
and what about software not breaking randomly?
a version number don't say *anything* about the impact of a update -
there are stol developers out there which are able to provide new
feautures without breaking everything left and right
show me as example *one* postfix major update in the last 10 years
breaking existing setups - not every upstream acts like GNOME