On 17. 10. 19 15:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 4:33 AM Miro Hrončok
<mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 17. 10. 19 2:27, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> So, literally every word of this is wrong. The negative feedback is
>> not "overwhelming". It is approximately four noisy individuals, all of
>> whom have expressed zero interest in understanding the actual
>> situation that they are trying to "fix" by endlessly insulting the
>> people working on the problem. Demoralizing the people who can dig us
>> out of this situation is an unwise strategy.
>
> Let me make this clear: I have a technical opinion (default modular streams are
> the wrong thing to do). If we are not considering that opinion, because it
> insults the people who have implemented the technical thing, we are making it
> personal.
>
> Everybody, please keep the discussion technical (that applies to both
"sides" here).
>
Apologies for the tone here. That was out of line. I need to stop
replying when I'm tired. And I wasn't thinking of you, Miro, when I
wrote this. Your feedback hasn't been "negative", it's been
"constructive" (in the way I think of things).
I appreciate you are trying to follow up on everything here. It must be very
frustrating and I am sorry that my proposal has caused it.
What bothers me ATM is that while the discussion is long and painful, it no
longer moves anywhere :(
IMHO Everybody have already said all their arguments at least twice. I wonder
how to move forward.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok