"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Testers need training guidelines and policies to work by, a proper
"work
flow" and if the responses to every matter are going to be like this one I
simply cut out the inefficient process.
The "inefficient process" is required to achieve a solution which actually
SATISFIES everybody rather than somebody's arbitrary decision.
I will write those guidelines policy and provide testers with a
decent
work flow.
With what authority?
Anyone that opposes anything in that guideline can than pick out
questionable issues , make them to a topic on this list or ask FESCo to
address those issue(s) in their meetings.
In fact I ask this to be escalated to FESCo right NOW and to get a clear
statement that you aren't allowed to unilaterally decide on a policy for
the entire project. This is not Guðmundssonix, it's Fedora!
There will be no time "pressure" matter since the guideline
has already
been written and made
With what authority?
Kevin Kofler