2010/3/6 Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert(a)googlemail.com>:
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 18:17 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
> Hi,
>
> 2010/3/6 Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert(a)foomail.com>:
> > While we are at it, here is another great update:
> >
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-3326
> >
> > * New version introduced in F11.
> > * Doesn't fix any bugs but it's an enhancement only.
> > * Useless update description "update to 4.7.1".
> > * And *of course* it was pushed directly to stable, even in F-13.
> >
> > Dear maintainers, please stop this!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Christoph
> >
>
> Is there any Fedora update policy?
Not yet, but we are working on it, see
http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/36737.html
> Because I don't understand the
> criteria for Fedora package update.
>
> Why I can install KDE 4.4 in F11 and I can't install latest gnome?
Because the KDE SIG uses different criteria than most of the other
packagers.
> From my user point of view, I would prefer to don't have any
> significant updates in previous stable version - just security fixes.
Fully agreed, but this is something we are discussing for the last two
weeks
I have seen some discussions, but I don't follow them. I'm waiting for
results ;)
and I don't expect an agreement in the near future.
Pity. There are many Fedora policies that are useless for end users
like me, but update policy would be quite usefull.
While I think
that the decision about an update should generally be up to the
maintainers, I think KDE or this update show that we were better off
with an official policy.
> Regards,
> Michal
Regards,
Christoph
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Regards,
Michal