John Hearns wrote:
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 09:08, Richard Hally wrote:
>They claim (by the nature of the URL) that it is FEDORA REDHAT. Aren't
>you concerned that someone may be misrepresenting that that it is REDHAT?
After all, it is a mirror of
http://fedora.redhat.com
The previous poster implied that "it could be anything". I'd like to
hear from someone at redhat whether it is really redhat or not. If it is
a fake mirror, don't you think redhat would be concerned? If it is a
good mirror why would Bill Notingham say Tuesday when it is already out?