On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
> I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
> review at
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
>
> Vala is described in more detail at
http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup
> like many Vala programs include both the Vala source code and the C
> "source code" to avoid a build time requirement of Vala and also because
> Vala is still in a rapidly evolving stage. Do I need to build from the
> original Vala source code or can I consider the machine generated C as
> "source"?
For rygel to date I've used the C as "source" unless I've needed to
patch a bug or build issue with it when you then need to regenerate
it.
Regards,
Peter
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
I'd probably compile the Vala source since that's what the upstream
project is written in and just have the build require Vala. Just my
opinion though. C is definitely the safe choice, but I think the more
Vala is used and tested the better it will get.
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
---------------------------------------------------------
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments