On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 14:40, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 18.7.2017 v 13:23 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
> On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 00:02, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at>
>>> The problem is that the RPMs that go into the Flatpaks are not FHS-
>>> compliant, so the RPMs will have to carry some conditionals and be built
>> Yes, that is true. Some apps will have to be patched for Flatpak, and
>> building them as both RPMs and Flatpaks is going to require conditionals. So
>> there will be some overhead if we support both.
> I think this is unacceptable and a blocker. It didn't work with SCLs and
> it won't work with Flatpak, either. Flatpaks must be possible to build
> from unmodified RPMs or as part of RPM build process.
It didn't work for SCLs? How comes?
We don't have SCLs in Fedora. Having the one spec file for both Fedora
and SCL is a huge pain (I'm told).
Back on topic, I read a bit more and it seems like koji is going to
support building Flatpaks leveraging the already available container and
module backend, so this is starting to look good to me.
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"