Jens-Ulrik Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> writes:
According to mpb at least:
mpb?
Mass PreBuilder
https://gitlab.com/fedora/packager-tools/mass-prebuild
The majority of those packages are maintained by me... so I can't
say I thrilled.
I thought ghc 9 was supposed to be okay with static trampolines?
MPB uses BuildRequires to collect all packages that *might* be affected
by your change. It builds all those packages with and without your
change, and lets you know what you broke. In this case, one broke (cjs,
since fixed), ten didn't build before my change anyway[*], and the rest
were OK. So if your package doesn't already FTBFS, you're good.
Are the results available?
MPB uses COPR, so..
"before" builds:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/djdelorie/libffi-3.4.4.checker/
"after" builds:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/djdelorie/libffi-3.4.4/
Note: I've done this before, so only look at the builds that are less
than a month old. There should be an "after" build for all packages
that BuildRequires libffi, and a "before" package for each package that
failed to build "after".
[*] I'm still investigating these, but usually, it's not related to the
change you're making.