On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 2016-12-23, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 10:42:33 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> On Friday, December 23, 2016 9:33:31 AM CET Petr Pisar wrote:
>> > >> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary
>> > >> arch builders for example?
>> > >
>> > > Those arches are all primary .. but ExclusiveArch could help.
>> > >
>> > No, it does not. I have noarch perl-Alien-ROOT with ExclusiveArch
>> > and I still receive reports about broken compose
>>
>> Is this the bug?
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/87
>
> Sorry, this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298668
>
No. This is a generic problem that the ExclusiveArch hack as
documents in packaging guidelines (i.e. noarch package with
ExclusiveArch including noarch) is not honored by infrastructure.
Sure, if by Infrastructure you mean koji. :)
It started happen half year ago when infrastruture migrated to the
new
compose database, I reported it into Fedora Hosted Track where nobody
respodned and then few months later infrastructure shutted down the
Track and moved to Pagure without migrating existing bug reports.
I don't see how the compose db has anything to do with this at all.
Do you have any links to the tickets? Also I don't know of any
infrastructure repo that was moved from trac -> pagure without also
moving old tickets. Which exact trac was this?
>> > and Koschei reports build failures when koji picks up
unlisted
>> > archictecture.
>>
>> Is this problem of Koschei or somewhere else? Have you tried to
>> report?
Koschei is only a symptom because it uses koji. There is nothing wrong
with Koschei.
Right.
kevin