On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 08:19:03AM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:03:33PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>
> >> for decades. Fedora 14's init system isn't that different to the
first version
> >> of RHL (4.0) I started using back in 96.
> >>
> > This is somewhat misleading. There have been many rewrites of the init
> > system in the past decade. In fact, the Fedora 14 init system has the
> > capability to be quite different than the SysVinit scripts that were adopted
> > in the mid-90s. What is true is that Fedora 14 had not switched to using
> > the incompatible-with-SysVinit features of its default (or any of its
> > optional) init systems so the presentation and behaviour was almost the
> > same as older SysVinit.
>
> That's true but due to the way we used it upstart was more or less a
> renamed sysVinit.
>
Which is what I said in my last sentence, yes? ;-)
Oh indeed ... probably a case of -E_NOCOFFEE ;)