Re: yum or dnf in the Fedora 22 Docker base image?
On 17.2.2015 12:33, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Not that I know of.
On 02/16/2015 09:50 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Thanks! Are there tracking bugs in Bugzilla I can subscribe to?
I don't
think there are any - feel free to file it.
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 02/16/2015 12:31 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think the F22 and Rawhide (Is it F23 at this point), should both use
dnf
>>>> not yum. We need to get more testing on dnf in containers.
>>> I'm ready to start testing F22 containers either way and would prefer
>>> dnf. What's the best process to get this rolling? Who owns the image -
>>> release engineering or Project Atomic? The reason I ask is that
>>> Project Atomic has their own mailing list and uses Trac, not the Red
>>> Hat Bugzilla, for issue tracking.
>>>
>>> Either way, my main upstream component (RStudio Server) may end up
>>> stuck with F21 - it doesn't link with the latest Boost right now and
>>> they only support CentOS and Debian/Ubuntu.
>> Vaclav is handling this right now. I don't see this as owned by
>> ProjectAtomic.
The problem currently is I am not able to build any Fedora
image due to
some Anaconda problems. I'll get back to you as soon as I have something
helpful.
Vašek
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
--
Lead Infrastructure Engineer
Developer Experience
Brno, Czech Republic