On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
<snip>
QA is a particular skill set, not every sig has a QA member and
requiring
it wouldn't work either. I feel it's like assuming that just because I've
done turbogears apps that someone would ask me to do CSS as well. I don't
think it's safe to assume that because someone can put a spin together
that they have the tools and knowledge to do proper QA on it.
-Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I'm not saying that it should be a requirement of a SIG, but if it
truly hits a point where it is not manageable from a QA standpoint to
support all ends of the Fedora project then things will have to take a
more granular approach and the QA project themselves will have to
scope out what they will and won't work on and I imagine the
SIGs/Spins will be first on the chopping block (and rightfully so).
-AdamM
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
---------------------------------------------------------
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments