On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Joshua C. <joshuacov(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
2009/1/30 Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com>:
>
> They advised that the same advice applies to Documentation.
>
> Never use "tm" or "(R)". If we are obliged by contract to mention
other
> trademarks in a legend, add the legend as required by the contract.
>
> In addition, our documentation should contain the disclaimer: "All
> other trademarks are the property of their respective owners."
>
> ~spot
Just a question here:
Since some of the contributors to fedora live/are located outside of
the usa, should they be "restricted" by the us trade mark law? The
code cannot be patented as a sequnce of mathematical formulas making a
given hardware to work in a definite way.
Maybe not complying to these rules could lead to packages being not
redestributed with fedora but they are still fedora-"legal" packages.
So putting them in rpm-fussion or other repos can circumvent this
don't-put-the-TM/R-symbol-in-your-description-policy.
Since these packages are bound to those trademarked names/patented
devices there should be a way to say thier proper name (fair use).
Software written to work with logithek should be described as such,
because the vendor decided to call thier product logithek. I don't see
another way to say this without the trademarked name.
Nobody said that logitech should not be used in the name.
You should not say that your software _Is_ logitech and don't use (R) or (TM).