Re: Anitya Upstream Release Monitoring - Dial back Auto-Bugzilla ticket generation

[Fabio Valentini]

On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 10:18 PM Chris <lead2gold(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  > I assume most package maintainers are not simultaneously upstream for their
> packages.
>
>  I would definitely agree with that! Just to clarify further, I guess i was hoping that
> Anitya could be smart enough to detect that a bugzilla wouldn't be necessary to be
> created in the event it's found already upstream i Fedora given this threshold I'm
> asking for.
>
>  In my situation, is it valid to just turn this off completely and not have a Bugzilla
> ticket created at all?  My passion for Fedora is enough that it's literally the next
> thing on my list to do once i push to PyPi :) 
Sure, why not? If the tickets are useless for you, then turn it off.
I think setting the monitoring status to "No monitoring" in the
left-hand panel on the src.fedoraproject.org page for your package
should be enough.

Fabio

>
> Chris
>
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 4:11 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 10:06 PM Chris <lead2gold(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I was just curious if there as a way to dial back the Upstream Release
Monitoring and the automatic Bugzilla ticket generation from it?
>> >
>> > I pushed a new release of my software to PyPi and I swear before I even got
access to the shell again (from the successful twine upload message), I was already
alerted by Anitya that a Bugzilla ticket has been created.
>> >
>> > Can we dial this back and give ... say.. 24 hours or so before creating
these tickets (when a new version is detected)? Just a question is all.  It's also
possible this is just it's an option that I carelessly overlooked (i do tend to do
these things)?
>> >
>> > I think the ticket is fantastic and very useful, I just think it should be
triggered after a longer wait period then 3μs :)
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> For my part, I like the anitya bugs to be filed as soon as it detects
>> a new version, without any artificial delay.
>> Your situation is a bit different, since you actually released the new
>> version yourself.
>> I assume most package maintainers are not simultaneously upstream for
>> their packages.
>>
>> Fabio
>>
>> > Chris
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]