On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 12:11 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
No, please look more closely. The above is a list of packages that
*use* or *require* ghostscript, not that link to it.
See my most recent contribution to this thread to see the correct
list
based on requirements for libgs.so.8 and libijs-0.35.so.
Yes, I saw that after I'd sent my reply. I had assumed the original list
was correct, and worked on that basis.
> An interesting side-question here is what license tag we should
use for
> an app whose license text states GPLv2+, but which we are linking
> against a GPLv3+ library, effectively meaning that its license for our
> purposes is GPLv3+...
Yes, indeed.
I should probably talk to Spot about that.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net