Hi,
On 03/05/2010 06:56 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On 03/05/2010 02:52 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> One size does still not fit all, although this is a great idea for
> most packages in Fedora for packages in certain niches this is a bad idea.
> I've said this before (and got 0 response), I believe
there should
> be some divide made between core packages (with core being quite big, not
> the bare essentials, but also most of all desktop environments, etc.) and
> non core packages.
Well, the reason I didn't respond before is because I thought I had no
disagreement with what you wrote. It seems obvious to me that even if
we made a policy that Fedora was primarily stable once released, that
there would always be exceptions to that rule and things that should be
updated more aggressively. So I would not advocate for any policy that
was absolute and inflexible. There should be room for human judgment to
play a role.
Ok I'm very happy to hear that, and hope this will be clearly reflected
in the final policy for this,
Regards,
Hans