On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 16:48 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:18:39 -0500, Paul Iadonisi
<pri.rhl3(a)iadonisi.to> wrote:
> Though generally I agree it's a good idea to push stuff like this
> upstream, based on the last discussion on this list with one of the
> OpenSSH developers, I have to wonder if it's going to do any good in
> this case.
Oh i didnt say it would do any good ultimately. My point is
upstream's perspective should be presented as early on in the
discussion as possible if there are rational reasons upstream used to
justify the change.
Yeah, I know. I just wasn't looking forward to that discussion.
If there aren't rational reasons, a reference to
an upstream discussion where the developers were told they are
on-crack would suffice.
Looks like the beginning of one such discussion starts here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=108544011109065&am...
I'm in the middle of reading it now.
--
-Paul Iadonisi
Senior System Administrator
Red Hat Certified Engineer / Local Linux Lobbyist
Ever see a penguin fly? -- Try Linux.
GPL all the way: Sell services, don't lease secrets