This is intended to be a generic approach to user space oom
management, but it does tie into resource control too. And the
resource control organization of what processes are considered
critical are different between a desktop and a server. The idea of
"user wants to take control or see what's going on" is a generally
important goal for all of this work, regardless of the Fedora edition
or spin.
So are you confirming that users are now going to need to place things in their own cgroup
if they do not want systemd-oomd to potentially kill the single cgroup containing all of
their running applications?
I think this should at the very least be clearly documented in the change proposal, as
this user experience is in stark contrast to what Gnome and KDE users will encounter.