seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 16:57 -0400, kas wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 16:17 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>
>
>
>>As was pointed out to me - I need to mark down today on my calendar:
>>June 14th - someone on fedora-devel-list said something positive about
>>yum.
>>:)
>>
>>thanks,
>>
>>-sv
>>
>>
>>
>I must say that yum has been working magnificently around here lately and
>on the odd occasion where there was a hickup/operator error, a solution
>was posted almost immediately. There is no question in my mind that if
>Fedora is to be the success we all hope it will be, it will be in large
>part due to the blood, sweat and tears Seth has poured into Yum.
>
>
There lots of folks beyond me working on this now.
Take a look at the AUTHORS file in the docs of yum.
All of those folks deserve credit.
-sv
Cheer *3 for the yum authors (and the FOSS developers in general).
While these lists always seem so negative since they are typically used
for hashing out problems, I suspect there is a silent happy majority out
there very appreciative of all the work contributed for the greater good.
Keep up the great work.
/Mike