On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 02:25:07PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 11:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote:
> Especially not by making some small change contingent on moonshot proposals.
> But I think that a) the current proposal is just a band-aid, and
> b) to make things better we don't need to make huge changes.
Okay, please open a _new_ change proposal with what you want to
happen: expanding the scope like you suggest feels like me getting
tricked to work on your much bigger change that's not terribly
well-defined or tested.
> ...Anaconda needs to *lose* a feature where it
> refuses VFAT for /boot [1], the various places which create partitions
> need to be modified to inject the right partition-type UUID instead of
> made-up one, and instead of creating two partitions with different fs
> types, create just one. None of this is rocket science.
Perhaps you'd like to push this feature. I'd happily retract my
smaller proposal if you've got patches ready for anaconda, have tested
this on all platforms, and have all the votes.
I'm adding some folks who made some recent Anaconda commits in CC.
For reference, the mail I'm replying to is at [1], and my earlier
proposal is at [2].
Would you be open to modifying Anaconda like this?
I think the code changes would be fairly easy, and I would be happy
to prepare a patch, but I don't want to do this if there's no chance
of it being accepted.
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
[2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
Zbyszek