On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:28 AM Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On 1/31/19 4:52 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
...snip...
> COPR was supposed to be that outlet, but no one gives a damn about it.
> Everyone complains that the service is "bad" and that the design is
> "bad" but no one wants to actually constructively improve it. The
> quality of service on COPR has fallen due to lack of care and
> unwillingness to invest, so what are we supposed to do? The horrible
I've heard you and some others say this, but can you perhaps expand on
it? How has quality of service of copr fallen?
There are some of current/recent major problems with COPR that did not
exist initially:
- builds failing due to failure to download packages from official
Fedora mirror
dl.fedoraproject.org
- builds failing due to problems with keygen (was not a problem before
keygen was introduced)
- builds failing to import to COPR distgit (was not a problem before
dist-git was introduced)
- outages caused by read-only filesystem after reboot - copr is
unusable until someone remounts it rw
- multi-day long outages caused by out of disk space
- multi-hour or even day- long build queues
- outdated SOP preventing non-COPR people like me from fixing COPR outages
--
Mikolaj