On 08/22/2011 01:29 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I'm pretty sure that we kicked this up to FESCo and they decided
to treat
them the same (although the latter may not have come to a formal vote and
only been discussed during their IRC meetings on the overall subject.) Going
back to the quote in this message, though, that was a result of discussions
with Lennart rather than FESCo.
Sure. I just want FESCo to either decide that socket-activated services
== the same as default enabled services, or that there is some sort of
separate whitelisting for socket-activated services.
~tom
==
Fedora Project