On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 08:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 09/24/2018 03:24 AM, M A Young wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Petr Ĺ abata wrote:
>
> > Definitely an error.
> >
> > Could be another case of
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629396, but it
> > should have been fixed last week. Is your repo current?
> > Could you check for the presence of modular repodata (the
> > *modules.yaml.gz) file.
>
> the dnf upgrade problem looks to me like
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616118
It's actually fallout from
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7827
Basically we are building flatpaks from modules, but then the modules
are getting into the normal module stream. They shouldn't and we need to
setup some different tagging for them to avoid it.
Well, that's part of it, but dnf actually printing these messages is
kind of a bug regardless. Even without that problem, there are always
likely to be some "real" modules that have packages in them which are
ahead of the non-modular package, and thus this bug will be prone to
happen so long as dnf doesn't just treat this as a normal situation and
print no warning message.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net