As I found this discussion interesting and I believe FESCo is the right
authority to help with this, I have opened a ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1495 for the FESCo meeting on
Wednesday, to discuss it.
Regards,
Jan
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net>
wrote:
Am 02.11.2015 um 02:28 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Dom, 2015-11-01 at 17:53 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sex, 2015-10-30 at 17:47 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>>>
>>>> At the third round of Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, that just
>>>> ends, has been Fedora 23 Final-RC10 declared as GOLD.
>>>> GA of this release is planed on Tuesday 2015-Nov-03.
>>>>
>>>> Today we got 531 updates for F23 , IMO, you should include it on Fedora
>>> 23 Final before GA , doesn't make sense (to me) after download an ISO
>>> have 1/2 Giga of updates, but this happens since RedHad 9 at least .
>>> IMO, testing team should respin ISO with updates and testing again .
>>> I have some difficulty in following all development, fortunately Fedora
>>> is always at great speed, but it is not easy to follow. And do more
>>> tests we not lose anything, IMHO.
>>>
>>
>> The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in the
>> installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If not
>> it's too much of a moving target to try and QA and ensure everything
>> works as expected. To freeze is a fairly standard procedure for all
>> distro development.
>>
>
> Make an respin for F23 with stable updates, IMHO, should not break
> anything, because at this stage, just stable things are being pushed
>
in theory
it should be just one more loop in testing phase, anyway if breaks
> something test team can freeze process again, until provide a fix.
>
who does the work for *what* benefit?
it's just wasting ressources and manpower
who cares about the install ISO when you ave anyways to apply updates
after or in the best case *due* setup
This is not new !, respins of fedoraunity was an example and we already
> have living respins [1], so we just need do new respin officially!.
> Shouldn't be a big deal, If I'm not mistaken.
>
and fedoraunity finally gave up because lack of ressources
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic