On 3 March 2010 13:57, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/03/2010 09:03 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 21:07 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> Ok... removing deprecated uses is a questionable at best update, but
>>> here is the kicker. The perl in F11 is perl-5.10.0-82.fc11. So these
>>> functions aren't actually deprecated in F11. So... why is this update
>>> going out? What possible benefit does the user get from this? Does
>>> anybody see this as a reasonable update to publish on F11?
>
> My own personal opinion is that stable updates should only fix serious
> issues, or security problems. Fedora has such a short lifetime as it is,
> I really can't see the value in pushing features to F11 when it will die
> soon. I think it's far better to leave the churn in rawhide.
Let F11 rott because it's EOL soon?
No. Bugfixes (serious ones) and security fixes would not allow it to
happen till the time it is EOL.
--
Rakesh Pandit
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rakesh
freedom, friends, features, first