Re: No response on BCC releated bugs
+Jiri in To
Dave Stux wrote on Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 09:39:23PM -0000:
I have opened bugs relating to bcc, and I see no reply on them.
Currently, at least in my testing, the state of ,pst pf the bcc dependent tools in F35 is
broken.
Examples:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127642
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057139
bcc 0.22 is quite old and I think you have it right in this bug: just updating
to a newer bcc version would likely fix all these issues.
fedora 37+ have bcc 0.24 which is more reasonable and probably works, so
I guess it'd just be a matter of pushing it for f35/36 as well.
(note there's a bcc 0.25 that might be good for rawhide, but it breaks
API on bcc_prog_load_xattr() breaking e.g. older gobpf or bpftrace,
see https://github.com/iovisor/bpftrace/issues/2340 , so that one should
not be backported -- but I'm not aware of any such problem for bcc 0.22
to 0.24)
I have filled non-responsive bug, but there's no reply on it
too:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2136222
Can anyone contact Jiri Olsa or update if he is out on vacation?
Is there an additional package maintainer?
--
Dominique