Re: hplip: hp-toolbox advertising?
Nicu Buculei wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Yuck, murky waters. I figured if an icon/logo was included
within GPL
> sources, and the GPL allows for unrestricted modification/redistribution,
> we were golden. Note, we're not talking about modifying the
> *trademarked* item in this case (which I would agree not a good idea),
> only using/displaying it.
Is not like that, consider the Red Hat icons/logos included in the
GPL
RHEL sources, a derivative distro is required to change them.
Yuck (again), my simple-minded non-lawyer common sense tells me such items
shouldn't be using the GPL then, but that's just me.
-- Rex