On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 11:53 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Kevin Fenzi (kevin(a)scrye.com) said:
> Well, I think the rationale was "these are basic services that are
> required to bring the machine up into a gui and allow a user to login
> and be able to apply updates, etc"
>
> At least that was my thought.
>
> I wonder now if we couldn't use the critical path setup to define
> these.
>
> Ie, "If your package is not critical path, it should not start by
> default. If it is, it _may_ start by default"
It's not bad, although it makes comps the arbiter, which seems a
little weird.
well, the arbiter of what's critpath is supposed to be the critpath
policy, not comps. Comps is just how the policy is implemented.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net