On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:52:09AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 13:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> This might be a good time to start discussing the possibility of
> having
> "organization" ACLs (e.g. if a bunch of employees at FB, or Datto, or
> another company -- or, say, an Apache project want to collectively
> maintain packages).
>
> Are you proposing "pkgdb" group such as:
>
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/ruby-packagers-sig
>
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/nodejs-sig
>
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/virtmaint-sig
>
Yes, precisely. Just with a slightly different scope.
>
> But groups can't be the "main admin" of a package.
>
That part is fine, the pkgdb group is sufficient to make sure a
consistent set of maintainers have access to the packages.
If there's no philosophical objection I can open an infra ticket and
see where it goes.
If you open a ticket, this may be an useful read prior to doing so:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/howtos/blob/master/f/groups_in_fedora.md?t...
(It'll help providing all the infos needed in the ticket).
Pierre