On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:10:59 -0500
fche(a)redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote:
praiskup wrote:
> [...]
> Cool. Let's provide 'pkgconf' so we can be also three, too! But
> at the same time please consider not dropping 'pkgconfig' for no
> reason.
... and also let's make sure that the new package does not break
builds. For one of ours, the .spec file contained:
BuildRequires: pkgconfig
BuildRequires: foo-devel
Yes, this is not canonical pkgconfig(foo) & perfect & stuff, but it's
worked for years. With the new changes, it breaks builds:
[...]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2704/17392704/root.log
DEBUG util.py:421: Error: package
pkgconf-pkg-config-1.2.0-1.fc26.aarch64 conflicts with pkgconfig <
1:0.29.1-2 provided by pkgconfig-1:0.29.1-1.fc25.aarch64
This will be fixed soon (today hopefully) without you needing to make
any more changes.
We need to get dnf updated on the aarch64/ppc64/ppc64le builders.
kevin