Test machines for maintainers (was: btrfs and default page sizes (4k vs 64k))
Hi, Kevin.
On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 19:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:08:46AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:07 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:09:42PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > I'm annoyed in general that we still have problems like this,
> > > and I'm even more annoyed that I basically have no way to even
> > > test or deal with these things. We *still* do not have packager
> > > test machines, so I can't even figure out how to craft a
> > > workaround if there is one (and I suspect one is possible).
> >
> > We do:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintai....
> > There's one ppc64le on that list.
> >
>
> They were all down, last I checked a month ago. But it seems like
> the ppc64le one is back online now. :)
The aarch64/armv7 ones are still down, but we got a vm elsewhere for
ppc64le. The x86_64 ones should all be up and working.
I'd really appreciate having an ARM machine available. I've had a few
bugs that occur only on ARM. Is there any ETA for their availability?
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan