On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Lennart Poettering
<mzerqung(a)0pointer.de> wrote:
On Wed, 23.01.13 22:17, Adam Williamson (awilliam(a)redhat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 19:47 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 22:47:18 +0000,
> > "\"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\"" <johannbg(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >b)
> > >
> > >We QA have alot of QA community members testing this so this does NOT
> > >require any additional effort or cause additional LOAD on the QA
> > >community.
> >
> > Aren't they just testing an upgrade of the default install?
>
> Correct:
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_upgrade_fedup_cli_previous_des... is the
only current upgrade test case.
>
> We could plausibly extend the range somewhat to cover common package
> loadouts (GNOME, KDE, minimal perhaps) and common configuration wrinkles
> (non-US keyboard layout, encryption, a couple of different partition
> schemes), for _one_ upgrade method. Anything beyond that would be a bit
> of a stretch, I think.
Wouldn't it make sense to test the "full install"?