On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 14:13 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:08:22PM +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> On 05/01/2008, Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr> wrote:
>>> In texlive but should be separate:
>>> xdvik (xdvi)
>> The need for this one would disappear if the evince packager would
>> enable the dvi backend in evince (BZ #187381).
> No, the need for this would not disappear, at least for me.
But it's still a good idea.
pxdvi (in xdvi) is definitely needed for Japanese pTeX users.