On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 15:00 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 09/01/2017 02:21 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> This is true and we have plans to implement this, but problem is
> we don't know how to represent data. When it is about installing
> packages -- it's more or less easy to show, but when upgrades /
> downgrades are involved it becomes way more complicated.
> If you have some actual suggestions -- feel free to contact me off
> or post them here. ☺
I won't claim to be a huge fan of the way that yum insisted on
spewing detailed dependency information, but it did provide the
information require to answer those "Why does Inkscape require
mdadm?" type questions.
The old repoquery had a --tree-requires option which was really great
(along with a few other --tree-* options)