On 08/12/2010 02:39 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "BN" == Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com>
writes:
>
> BN> I can't help but note that the slips have become more frequent as we
> BN> started to actually *have* release criteria to test against. We
> BN> didn't slip nearly as much when we weren't testing it.
>
> To me this implies that we should begin testing earlier (or, perhaps,
> never stop testing) and treat any new failure as an event of
> significance. It's tough to meet a six month cycle if we spend half of
> it telling people to expect everything to be broken.
>
Possibly also stop changing earlier?
The window for changes is already far too short.
--
Peter
01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789