On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:18:15 +0200
drago01 <drago01(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200
> drago01 <drago01(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in
fast but
>> bandwith capped vs. not.
>>
>> If building deltas are slow the solution is not to disable them
>> but to find out why there are slow and fix that. One thing for
>> instance is that it insists on generating the original rpm while
>> creating an uncompressed rpm would save a compress + uncompressed
>> cycle during updates (the former is a bit extensive for xz).
>
> I think It could avoid doing that if people didn't mind that it
> couldn't be gpg checked.
Well the delta files themselves could be signed no?
I do not think that would work, no.
kevin