On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 01:24:28PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
Here's one:
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/849
Here's a second one, but yesterday I found out that there was a related PR
merged, so I updated it:
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
A third one:
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/501
ok, looked at all those, thanks.
> I expect it's valuable to have the logic for multilibs,
"self
> > contained" in the package instead of to rely on any infra tweaks.
> >
> > (1)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/PackageKit/pull-request/7
>
> Yeah, I would definitely prefer that.
Adding normal packages are requirements for a devel package just to make it
multilib feels... unclean? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. In order
to have the logic self-contained, why don't we add something like
"Provides: multilib(x86_64, i686)" into affected packages and make pungi
process that?
Feel free to suggest it to rpm. ;)
I'd personally just like to drop i686 entirely, but I don't think
everyone else is ready for that.
kevin