----- Original Message -----
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> >>> And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is
> >>> really
> >>> not a good tool for spec maintenance.
> >>
> >> Not duplicating the changelog would help. There's little reason
> >> to
> >> have a changelog in git which is then manually copied into
> >> %changelog.
> >
> > +1, for me - GIT is the authority for change logs, not SPEC...
>
> -1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files.
> A database's (git), temporary meta information is irrelvant.
+1, the changelog is available to the user through an rpm query which
is
essential and useful to covey what has has been done.
I'm trying to backport most important changes to changelog from GIT
but usually the GIT log is where I look to get the real changes...
I understand Changelog has a meaning and it would be really great to
have these two in sync somehow auto-magically generated :)
R.
Ian
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel