On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 23:04 +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
A good initiative, but seems to be stillborn (stillbirth? In french
:
« mort-
né ») as it seems to be optionnal.
What I wanted to point is, as an example, my Utility menu is really
too full!
There are 29 applications entries in it, this is unreadable.
On FC6, my Utility menu have 7 submenus:
- Accessibility
- Office
- Text editors
- Files
- Devices
- PIM
- Others
It was really more convenient...
There's no need to break the upstream spec for this. It already allows
you to specify the type of app at a pretty fine level (there's
categories for text editors and so on). Exactly how to construct the
final system menus *from* the categories defined in the .desktop file is
left up to the DE / distro to decide, so Fedora could choose to have
more levels in its menus if we wanted to.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net